Should You Take A Shower Before Waxing Your Legs?

A serious summit decision

I come home after a week laburando, I get to check emails, watch a couple of things, and suddenly entered Perfil.com and I find that Nestor Kirchner is gaining a privileged pension of 27,000 pesos a month as a former president .

I have about 5 good reasons to repeal in general and for once the retirements of privilege, but I have about 671,049 valid and specific reasons for rejecting particularly Nestor Kirchner.

And one of them all is this:

June 30, 2007 (Thelma, eg)
The Government rejected the retirement of the mayors of Buenos Aires privilege

The owner of ANSES , Sergio Massa, said the President conveyed his outrage. He added that the village headman of Florencio Varela, Julio Pereyra and the president's Social Security Institute the Province of Buenos Aires, disagreed with the measure. Scioli also expressed "overwhelming rejection."

The owner of the National Social Security (ANSES), Sergio Massa, rejected the bill that would allow mayors who retire at age 50 and without additional contributions to its mandate and said that President Nestor Kirchner conveyed his outrage .

"We are making efforts to stand up to the Argentina to go around creating privileges," Massa said in dialogue with Télam c omentum in a telephone conversation with Kirchner, the President expressed his indignation and rejection.

"The truth is that it causes a bit of surprise," the average sanction the provincial Chamber of Deputies the proposal to amend four sections of the Act 5675 which provides for special pensions, said Massa, who is a subject for "almost irritating."

"That determines if it becomes law, an absurdity," the official stressed in dialogue with Radio 10, and recalled that the province has an agreement with the National since 2005 for which the latter "will fund the deficit in the pension fund under an agreement established to harmonize laws, among other things. "

For Massa, "harmonization mean that the rules have similarities, and this is an issue almost irritating because as a public employee is asked to contribute 30 years and 60 years old find the contradiction that someone who is lucky enough to attend an election is given a privileged legal text that does nothing but alienate the policy of the people. "

"What we have to do is the reverse, bringing people into politics" considered, while recalled that since "2002 has been repealing all schemes are known as privileged ".

" I sought too late yesterday with the president of the Federation Argentina of Municipalities (FAM), Julio Perez, told me that he was unaware and did not agree with this project, "the official confided.

He said" I also asked the opinion of the Institute of Social Welfare the Province of Buenos Aires as it is an issue that manages the pension fund of the province of Buenos Aires and I said that obviously had not been consulted and did not agree. "

In the same vein, the vice president and gubernatorial candidate Buenos Aires, Daniel Scioli, expressed "strong rejection" to the project.

Scioli said and let him know his "resounding rejection" of Argentina Federation of Municipalities (FAM), before attending the meeting that the organization conducted in Bahia Blanca.

"This is half penalty, so I still have all the instruments now in the Senate by no means pass this bill," said Scioli told Radio 10.

Meanwhile, recalled that, anyway, "is always the instance to veto this project from the government", since "runs counter what we are driving from the Nation and what does the good policy. "